Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Election Predictions UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
73% | 27% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
73% | 27% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Darline Graham Nordone | 73% |
| Candidate A | 50% |
| Candidate B | 50% |
| Candidate C | 50% |
| Candidate D | 50% |
| Candidate E | 50% |
| Candidate F | 50% |
| Candidate G | 50% |
| Candidate H | 50% |
| Candidate I | 50% |
| Candidate J | 50% |
| Other | 50% |
| Ralph Norman | 24% |
| Russell Fry | 5% |
| Duke Buckner | 0% |
| Mark Lynch | 0% |
| Mark Sanford | 0% |
| Sheri Biggs | 0% |
| Pamela Evette | 0% |
| Trey Gowdy | 0% |
| Henry McMaster | 0% |
Market context
The special Republican primary for South Carolina’s vacant US Senate seat is a crowded first-round contest, with the winner decided by who tops the vote on 11 August, unless no one clears 50% and the race advances to a runoff on 25 August. Twelve candidates filed, but the ballot is being shaped by a smaller set of familiar names with existing statewide or federal profiles, and the market’s 0% implied probability for a YES result suggests traders are not yet pricing in a clear front-runner for the first round.[3][4][14]
Past South Carolina Republican primaries suggest name recognition, establishment support and geographic strength can matter more than the sheer number of candidates. Mark Lynch re-entered after finishing second to Lindsey Graham in the regular June primary, while Ralph Norman and Russell Fry bring congressional bases, and former governor Mark Sanford adds a recognised statewide brand; that mix makes this closer to a fragmented vote-splitting contest than a simple plurality win. Outside prediction-market data has also leaned towards Fry as the favourite, with Norman a secondary choice, which helps explain why the first-round outcome remains open even with voting imminent.[10][15]
The key catalysts are candidate withdrawals, late endorsements, and any fresh polling or fundraising disclosures before election day. Early voting ran from 5 to 7 August, so remaining mail and Election Day turnout patterns should matter, especially if one faction consolidates behind a stronger regional contender.[6][17] Coverage from AP and local outlets shows the field was set only after a very short filing window, leaving little time for sustained advertising or debate-driven momentum to fully settle.[14][3] Traders are therefore likely leaning most on whether the better-known candidates can convert their media profile and campaign resources into a plurality rather than waiting for a runoff signal.
Methodology
Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for South Carolina Senate Special Republican Primary: First Round Winner plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.
Resolution & payout
For political markets the resolution source is decisive. Polymarket defines a concrete source per contract (e.g. AP, Reuters, official electoral commission) and uses the UMA Optimistic Oracle as the on-chain dispute mechanism. With a clearly defined outcome the USDC payout lands within minutes of the final confirmation.
UK Frequently Asked Questions
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- Can prediction markets influence election outcomes?
- Markets reflect expectations rather than create them. Studies show public-facing markets can anchor expectations, but don't influence the underlying outcome. Political markets are information, not advocacy.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like Election Predictions UK route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- Are UK election prediction markets available from the UK?
- Yes. Betfair Exchange and Smarkets offer UKGC-regulated UK election markets (seat counts, party share, constituency results). Polymarket also lists UK election contracts with deeper global liquidity. Betfair winnings are typically tax-free for UK individuals; Polymarket profits are subject to HMRC CGT.
Trade South Carolina Senate Special Republican Primary: Fi… on Election Predictions UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →