Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Election Predictions UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
9% | 91% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
9% | 91% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Rory McIlroy | 9% |
| Tommy Fleetwood | 4% |
| Ludvig Aberg | 3% |
| Matt Fitzpatrick | 3% |
| Patrick Cantlay | 2% |
| Wyndham Clark | 2% |
| Alex Fitzpatrick | 2% |
| Chris Gotterup | 2% |
| Tyrrell Hatton | 2% |
| Viktor Hovland | 2% |
| Robert MacIntyre | 2% |
| Angel Ayora | 1% |
| Bud Cauley | 1% |
| Eugenio Lopez-Chacarra | 1% |
| Eric Cole | 1% |
| Pierceson Coody | 1% |
| Harris English | 1% |
| Ryan Fox | 1% |
| Ryan Gerard | 1% |
| Doug Ghim | 1% |
| Max Greyserman | 1% |
| Nicolai Hojgaard | 1% |
| Si Woo Kim | 1% |
| Tom Kim | 1% |
| Kurt Kitayama | 1% |
| Jake Knapp | 1% |
| Min Woo Lee | 1% |
| Hao-Tong Li | 1% |
| Shane Lowry | 1% |
| Alexander Noren | 1% |
| Zach Bauchou | 0% |
| Dan Bradbury | 0% |
| Daniel Brown | 0% |
| Brian Campbell | 0% |
| Laurie Canter | 0% |
| Ricky Castillo | 0% |
| Seungbin Choi | 0% |
| Corey Conners | 0% |
| Martin Couvra | 0% |
| Cam Davis | 0% |
| Alejandro Del Ray | 0% |
| Hendrik Du Plessis | 0% |
| Nicolas Echavarria | 0% |
| Nacho Elvira | 0% |
| Ewen Ferguson | 0% |
| Grant Forrest | 0% |
| Dylan Frittelli | 0% |
| Julien Guerrier | 0% |
| Jordan Gumberg | 0% |
| Harry Hall | 0% |
| Brian Harman | 0% |
| Pádraig Harrington | 0% |
| Angel Hidalgo | 0% |
| Joe Highsmith | 0% |
| Calum Hill | 0% |
| Daniel Hillier | 0% |
| Charley Hoffman | 0% |
| Rasmus Hojgaard | 0% |
| Billy Horschel | 0% |
| Rikuya Hoshino | 0% |
| Mark Hubbard | 0% |
| Sung-Jae Im | 0% |
| Scott Jamieson | 0% |
| Casey Jarvis | 0% |
| Ryggs Johnston | 0% |
| Kota Yuta Kaneko | 0% |
| Yuto Katsuragawa | 0% |
| Johnny Keefer | 0% |
| Baekjun Kim | 0% |
| Michael Kim | 0% |
| Chris Kirk | 0% |
| Brooks Koepka | 0% |
| Jacques Kruyswijk | 0% |
| Frederic Lacroix | 0% |
| Joakim Lagergren | 0% |
| Pablo Larrazábal | 0% |
| Thriston Lawrence | 0% |
| Junghwan Lee | 0% |
| Mikael Lindberg | 0% |
| Joost Luiten | 0% |
| Matteo Manassero | 0% |
| Richard Mansell | 0% |
| Matt McCarty | 0% |
| Tom McKibbin | 0% |
| Mac Meissner | 0% |
| Adrian Meronk | 0% |
| Guido Migliozzi | 0% |
| Francesco Molinari | 0% |
| Taylor Moore | 0% |
| Dylan Naidoo | 0% |
| Keita Nakajima | 0% |
| Rasmus Neergaard-Petersen | 0% |
| Niklas Norgaard Moller | 0% |
| Shaun Norris | 0% |
| Andrew Novak | 0% |
| Tae-Hoon Ok | 0% |
| Thorbjorn Olesen | 0% |
| Adrián Otaegui | 0% |
| John Parry | 0% |
| Matthieu Pavon | 0% |
| Player 0 | 0% |
| Player 1 | 0% |
| Player 2 | 0% |
| Player 3 | 0% |
| Player 4 | 0% |
| Player 5 | 0% |
| Player 6 | 0% |
| Player 7 | 0% |
| Player 8 | 0% |
| Player 9 | 0% |
| Player 10 | 0% |
| Player 11 | 0% |
| Player 12 | 0% |
| Player 13 | 0% |
| Player 14 | 0% |
| Player 15 | 0% |
| Player 16 | 0% |
| Player 17 | 0% |
| Player 18 | 0% |
| Player 19 | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
Market context
The underlying event is the 2026 Genesis Scottish Open at The Renaissance Club, where a specific listed golfer must win to trigger a "Yes" outcome. With the market currently pricing this player at just 3%, the probability reflects a steep uphill battle against a field packed with the world’s elite, including Scottie Scheffler and Rory McIlroy.
Historically, similar long-shot markets in major golf tournaments have rarely resolved positively unless the favourite suffers a catastrophic collapse or the listed player is a local specialist with exceptional course knowledge. In the 2024 Scottish Open, the favourite held firm, and outsiders with odds beyond 20-1 failed to win, suggesting that a 3% implied probability is not merely cautious but aligns with the typical difficulty of unseating top-tier contenders in a packed field.
Traders should monitor pre-tournament odds movements and any late withdrawals, as Scottie Scheffler’s dominance at +500 (FanDuel) remains the primary barrier to success. A key catalyst is the official field confirmation released by the PGA Tour, which dictates whether the listed player remains in contention; any elimination based on tournament rules instantly resolves the market to "No". Recent betting aggregates from BetMGM confirm Scheffler’s 14.29% implied probability, reinforcing that the market is leaning heavily on his performance rather than the listed player’s potential.
Methodology
This page tracks PGA Tour: Genesis Scottish Open Winner across four political prediction venues. Live odds come from the Polymarket order book (the deepest political prediction-market book). Kalshi is the CFTC-regulated US alternative, Betfair the established UK sports-exchange with politics markets, Manifold the open play-money variant. For users geo-blocked from Polymarket directly, brokers like Election Predictions UK provide a 0%-fee route into the same order book.
Resolution & payout
For political markets the resolution source is decisive. Polymarket defines a concrete source per contract (e.g. AP, Reuters, official electoral commission) and uses the UMA Optimistic Oracle as the on-chain dispute mechanism. With a clearly defined outcome the USDC payout lands within minutes of the final confirmation.
FAQ
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like Election Predictions UK route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- How fast do political markets react to news?
- High-liquidity markets move within seconds to minutes. A Trump tweet on the economy can shift the "Trump 2024" market 2-5 points before mainstream media has written anything.
- Are political prediction markets legal in my country?
- It varies. They sit in legal gray areas in most jurisdictions. Polymarket is geo-blocked from US/UK/EU; some broker frontends have a different geo footprint. Trade only with capital you can afford to lose, and only if you understand the legal status in your jurisdiction.
Trade PGA Tour: Genesis Scottish Open Winner on Election Predictions UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →