Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Election Predictions UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
92% | 8% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
92% | 8% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 35.5 | 92% |
| O/U 37.5 | 92% |
| O/U 39.5 | 82% |
| O/U 41.5 | 78% |
| O/U 43.5 | 75% |
| Army O/U 20.5 | 71% |
| O/U 45.5 | 67% |
| O/U 47.5 | 66% |
| Tulsa O/U 23.5 | 64% |
| O/U 49.5 | 61% |
| Army O/U 23.5 | 61% |
| O/U 51.5 | 56% |
| Tulsa O/U 26.5 | 54% |
| Spread -0.5 | 51% |
| 1H O/U 21.5 | 51% |
| 1H O/U 24.5 | 51% |
| 1H O/U 33.5 | 51% |
| Tulsa O/U 29.5 | 51% |
| Army O/U 3.5 | 51% |
| Tulsa O/U 3.5 | 51% |
| 1H Moneyline | 51% |
| 1Q Moneyline | 51% |
| Army vs. Tulsa | 50% |
| Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| O/U 53.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 27.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 30.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 33.5 | 50% |
| 1Q O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| 1Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 1Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 1Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Army O/U 26.5 | 50% |
| Army O/U 29.5 | 50% |
| Army O/U 32.5 | 50% |
| Army 1H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Army 1H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Army 1H O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa 1H O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa 1H O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa 1H O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Army 2H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Army 2H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Army 2H O/U 15.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa 2H O/U 12.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa 2H O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa 2H O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 50% |
| Game Goes to Overtime | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 50% |
| Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 50% |
| Army vs. Tulsa: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 50% |
| Pick-Six Scored | 50% |
| Army vs. Tulsa: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| Army vs. Tulsa: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 50% |
| Army 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Army 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Army Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Army Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Army Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Army Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Army Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Army Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 50% |
| Army Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 50% |
| Army vs. Tulsa: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Tulsa Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| Army vs. Tulsa: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Army vs. Tulsa: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 2H Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 1Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 3Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| 4Q Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| 2H Moneyline | 50% |
| 2Q Moneyline | 50% |
| 3Q Moneyline | 50% |
| 4Q Moneyline | 50% |
| Spread -1.5 | 48% |
| Spread -1.5 | 48% |
| Spread -2.5 | 47% |
| 1H O/U 27.5 | 47% |
| 1H Spread -0.5 | 47% |
| Spread -2.5 | 46% |
| 1Q O/U 10.5 | 46% |
| 1H Spread -0.5 | 46% |
| 1H Spread -1.5 | 45% |
| 2Q Spread -0.5 | 44% |
| O/U 55.5 | 43% |
| 1H Spread -1.5 | 43% |
| Spread -3.5 | 40% |
| 1Q Spread -0.5 | 40% |
| Spread -3.5 | 39% |
| O/U 57.5 | 38% |
| 1H Spread -3.5 | 38% |
| Spread -4.5 | 37% |
| Spread -4.5 | 37% |
| 1H Spread -3.5 | 37% |
| 1H O/U 30.5 | 36% |
| Spread -5.5 | 35% |
| Spread -5.5 | 35% |
| Spread -6.5 | 33% |
| O/U 59.5 | 33% |
| Spread -6.5 | 32% |
| Tulsa O/U 35.5 | 31% |
| O/U 61.5 | 29% |
| Spread -7.5 | 28% |
| Tulsa O/U 32.5 | 28% |
| Spread -7.5 | 26% |
| Spread -8.5 | 26% |
| O/U 63.5 | 26% |
| Spread -8.5 | 25% |
| Spread -10.5 | 22% |
| Spread -10.5 | 21% |
| O/U 65.5 | 21% |
| Spread -13.5 | 19% |
| O/U 67.5 | 19% |
| Spread -13.5 | 18% |
| Spread -14.5 | 16% |
| O/U 69.5 | 16% |
| Spread -14.5 | 15% |
| Spread -16.5 | 14% |
| Spread -17.5 | 14% |
| Spread -16.5 | 13% |
| Spread -17.5 | 10% |
| Spread -20.5 | 8% |
| O/U 71.5 | 8% |
| Spread -20.5 | 7% |
| O/U 73.5 | 7% |
| O/U 75.5 | 7% |
Market context
Army vs. Tulsa — current market-implied probability: 92%. In the upcoming college football game between Army and Tulsa, scheduled for October 23 at 8:30PM ET: This market will resolve to "Army" if Army win the game. This market will resolve to "Tulsa" if Tul…
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $158K.
Methodology
Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for Army vs. Tulsa plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.
Resolution & payout
Political markets typically settle on official candidate or agency confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window opens, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD via CFTC clearinghouse, with clearly defined resolution sources (e.g. AP race calls for elections). Betfair settles after the official outcome is registered with the league or agency. Manifold is play-money.
UK Frequently Asked Questions
- Can prediction markets influence election outcomes?
- Markets reflect expectations rather than create them. Studies show public-facing markets can anchor expectations, but don't influence the underlying outcome. Political markets are information, not advocacy.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like Election Predictions UK route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- Are political prediction markets legal in my country?
- It varies. They sit in legal gray areas in most jurisdictions. Polymarket is geo-blocked from US/UK/EU; some broker frontends have a different geo footprint. Trade only with capital you can afford to lose, and only if you understand the legal status in your jurisdiction.
- Why do Polymarket and Kalshi differ on elections?
- Kalshi must follow CFTC compliance — strict definitions, clear resolution sources, US citizens only with KYC. Polymarket operates globally without CFTC oversight — deeper liquidity, but also higher regulatory risk.
- Are UK election prediction markets available from the UK?
- Yes. Betfair Exchange and Smarkets offer UKGC-regulated UK election markets (seat counts, party share, constituency results). Polymarket also lists UK election contracts with deeper global liquidity. Betfair winnings are typically tax-free for UK individuals; Polymarket profits are subject to HMRC CGT.
Trade Army vs. Tulsa on Election Predictions UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →