Market statistics
- Total volume
- $1.3M
- 24h volume
- $1.3M
- Liquidity
- $987K
- Open interest
- $896K
Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
52% | 48% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
52% | 48% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Available prediction outcomes (12)
Sorted by descending live probability. Click any outcome to trade it on PolyGram.
Market context
MOUZ and 9z will compete in a best-of-three Counter-Strike match during the PGL Astana Group Stage, with the fixture scheduled for 11 May 2026 at 07:00 ET. The 87% implied probability favours the European side, reflecting their established standing within the competitive Counter-Strike landscape. MOUZ has maintained consistent qualification to major tournaments and typically fields experienced rosters capable of competing against international opposition, whilst 9z, an Argentine organisation, represents a lower-seeded regional competitor in this format.
Historical precedent suggests that seeding disparities of this magnitude in group-stage matches correlate with the favoured team's victory roughly 80–90% of the time, though upsets occur when lower-ranked teams exploit specific map pools or tactical preparation. MOUZ's recent tournament appearances and roster stability provide a foundation for the current probability assessment, though Counter-Strike outcomes remain volatile across individual matches due to map selection dynamics and in-game execution variance.
Traders should monitor official PGL communications regarding match scheduling confirmations, any roster changes announced before the fixture, and map pool selections, which significantly influence matchup outcomes. The settlement window closes 11 May at 17:00 UTC, allowing a ten-hour buffer beyond the scheduled start time. Delays beyond seven days without resolution would trigger a 50-50 split, creating a tail risk for traders holding positions. Recent tournament broadcasts via BLAST and ESL platforms indicate standard operational procedures for group-stage fixtures, suggesting scheduling adherence remains probable.
Wikipedia Context
-
Counter-Strike: SourceCounter-Strike: Source is a tactical first-person shooter video game developed by Valve and Turtle Rock Studios. Released in October 2004 for Windows, it is a remake of Counter-Strike (2000) using the Source game engine. As in the original, Counter-Strike: Source pits a team of counter-terrorists against a team of terrorists in a series of rounds. Each round
Methodology
Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs 9z (BO3) - PGL Astana Group Stage plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.
Resolution & payout
Resolution source: This market settles from the official publication at https://www.twitch.tv/PGL. A proposer submits the result to the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon, the two-hour challenge window opens, and the smart contract pays out in USDC.
Political markets typically settle on official candidate or agency confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window opens, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD via CFTC clearinghouse, with clearly defined resolution sources (e.g. AP race calls for elections). Betfair settles after the official outcome is registered with the league or agency. Manifold is play-money.
FAQ
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like PolyGram route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- How fast do political markets react to news?
- High-liquidity markets move within seconds to minutes. A Trump tweet on the economy can shift the "Trump 2024" market 2-5 points before mainstream media has written anything.
- Which political events have the biggest volume?
- US Presidential election, party nominations (DNC/RNC), Senate majorities, individual state outcomes (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin), and major European elections. Peak markets reach $50-500M per event.
Trade Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs 9z (BO3) - PGL Astana Group … on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →