Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Election Predictions UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
94% | 6% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
94% | 6% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 94% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 79% |
| O/U 1.5 | 78% |
| United States O/U 0.5 | 77% |
| Belgium O/U 0.5 | 76% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 73% |
| Both Teams to Score | 59% |
| O/U 2.5 | 54% |
| Team to Advance | 52% |
| United States 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| United States 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Belgium 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Belgium 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 49% |
| United States 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 48% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 48% |
| Belgium 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 47% |
| United States O/U 1.5 | 42% |
| Belgium O/U 1.5 | 40% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 36% |
| O/U 3.5 | 32% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 32% |
| Will the Match Go to Extra Time? | 28% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 22% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 22% |
| Belgium O/U 2.5 | 18% |
| United States (-1.5) | 17% |
| Belgium (-1.5) | 17% |
| United States O/U 2.5 | 17% |
| O/U 4.5 | 16% |
| Will the Match Go to a Penalty Shootout? | 16% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 14% |
| United States 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 14% |
| Belgium 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 13% |
| United States (-2.5) | 7% |
| Belgium (-2.5) | 7% |
| O/U 5.5 | 7% |
| O/U 6.5 | 3% |
| United States (-3.5) | 2% |
| Belgium (-3.5) | 2% |
| O/U 7.5 | 2% |
| Belgium (-4.5) | 1% |
| United States (-5.5) | 1% |
| Belgium (-5.5) | 1% |
| O/U 8.5 | 1% |
| United States (-4.5) | 0% |
Market context
The underlying real-world event is the FIFA World Cup Round of 16 match between the United States and Belgium, scheduled for Monday, 6 July at 8:00 PM ET in Seattle. This fixture marks the second time in the last three World Cups that these nations have met at this stage, with Belgium having dominated a recent warm-up encounter by a 5–2 scoreline in March 2026, exposing American defensive frailties[1][3].
Historically, comparable knockout clashes between these sides suggest the current 17% YES probability for the US to win is conservative given the oddsmakers’ view that the US is favoured at -130 to advance, despite the absence of striker Folarin Balogun[2]. In previous World Cup rounds where a host nation faced a higher-ranked European team, the home advantage often narrowed the implied probability gap, yet Belgium remains a narrow implied favourite at 36% against the US’s 39% in the match winner market[4].
Traders should monitor pre-match tactical declarations from both coaches and any late campaign-finance disclosures regarding squad funding, as these could shift sentiment before the settlement window closes on 7 July 2026[1]. The market is leaning on the catalyst of Balogun’s confirmed absence, which oddsmakers at DraftKings have already factored into the US’s advancement odds, suggesting the 17% figure may not fully account for the US’s resilience in previous home knockout games[2].
Methodology
Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for United States vs. Belgium - More Markets plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.
Resolution & payout
Political markets typically settle on official candidate or agency confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window opens, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD via CFTC clearinghouse, with clearly defined resolution sources (e.g. AP race calls for elections). Betfair settles after the official outcome is registered with the league or agency. Manifold is play-money.
FAQ
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like Election Predictions UK route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- How fast do political markets react to news?
- High-liquidity markets move within seconds to minutes. A Trump tweet on the economy can shift the "Trump 2024" market 2-5 points before mainstream media has written anything.
- Which political events have the biggest volume?
- US Presidential election, party nominations (DNC/RNC), Senate majorities, individual state outcomes (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin), and major European elections. Peak markets reach $50-500M per event.
Trade United States vs. Belgium - More Markets on Election Predictions UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →