Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Election Predictions UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Inter Miami CF O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Chicago Fire FC O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Chicago Fire FC 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 99% |
| O/U 2.5 | 91% |
| Inter Miami CF O/U 1.5 | 75% |
| Chicago Fire FC O/U 1.5 | 68% |
| O/U 3.5 | 67% |
| Inter Miami CF O/U 2.5 | 62% |
| Inter Miami CF 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 51% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| Inter Miami CF 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Inter Miami CF 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Chicago Fire FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Chicago Fire FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| O/U 4.5 | 40% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 34% |
| Chicago Fire FC O/U 2.5 | 28% |
| O/U 5.5 | 19% |
| Inter Miami CF (-1.5) | 18% |
| Inter Miami CF 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 17% |
| Chicago Fire FC 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 15% |
| Chicago Fire FC (-1.5) | 13% |
| Inter Miami CF (-2.5) | 5% |
| Chicago Fire FC (-2.5) | 3% |
Market context
Inter Miami’s home match against Chicago Fire is the real-world event behind this market, and the crowd’s 18% YES implies traders are assigning a low chance to the relevant “more markets” condition being reached by the settlement window. That sits well below typical match-result pricing: recent pre-match models and bookmaker-style previews have made Inter Miami only a narrow favourite, with one model putting them at 45.9% and another at 38%, while betting odds have also treated the game as competitive rather than one-sided.[1][2][4]
Historically, low-probability prediction markets of this sort tend to stay subdued unless a clear exogenous catalyst appears late, such as a team announcement, a surprise line-up change, or a structural schedule shift that materially alters the information set before kick-off. For this fixture, the main catalyst to watch is the final pre-match team news and any late injury or absence disclosures, because the market’s lean appears to be tied more to those availability signals than to any broad expectation of a lopsided result.[1][4] Recent previews also point to goal-heavy scenarios and a live favourite edge for Inter Miami, which suggests the market is leaning on match-specific availability and line-up expectations rather than on a wider news cycle.[3][5]
Methodology
Political prediction markets differ structurally from sports betting: thinner liquidity, longer settlement windows, higher sensitivity to single news events. This page shows the live Polymarket quote for Inter Miami CF vs. Chicago Fire FC - More Markets plus platform attributes for the three reference venues, so you can see at a glance where the deepest market for this question sits.
Resolution & payout
For political markets the resolution source is decisive. Polymarket defines a concrete source per contract (e.g. AP, Reuters, official electoral commission) and uses the UMA Optimistic Oracle as the on-chain dispute mechanism. With a clearly defined outcome the USDC payout lands within minutes of the final confirmation.
FAQ
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- How fast do political markets react to news?
- High-liquidity markets move within seconds to minutes. A Trump tweet on the economy can shift the "Trump 2024" market 2-5 points before mainstream media has written anything.
- Are political prediction markets legal in my country?
- It varies. They sit in legal gray areas in most jurisdictions. Polymarket is geo-blocked from US/UK/EU; some broker frontends have a different geo footprint. Trade only with capital you can afford to lose, and only if you understand the legal status in your jurisdiction.
- Which political events have the biggest volume?
- US Presidential election, party nominations (DNC/RNC), Senate majorities, individual state outcomes (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin), and major European elections. Peak markets reach $50-500M per event.
Trade Inter Miami CF vs. Chicago Fire FC - More Markets on Election Predictions UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →