Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Election Predictions UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
85% | 15% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
85% | 15% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Mojtaba Khamenei | 85% |
| No Head of State | 3% |
| Reza Pahlavi | 3% |
| Alireza Arafi | 2% |
| Hassan Khomeini | 1% |
| Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf | 1% |
| Muhammad Mirbaqiri | 0% |
| Sadegh Larijani | 0% |
| Hassan Shariatmadari | 0% |
| Maryam Rajavi | 0% |
| Massoud Rajavi | 0% |
| Seyed Hossein Mousavian | 0% |
| Reza Pirzadeh | 0% |
| Navid Shomali | 0% |
| Mustafa Hijri | 0% |
| Ali Motahari | 0% |
| Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel | 0% |
| Mostafa Pourmohammadi | 0% |
| Sadegh Mahsouli | 0% |
| Masoud Pezeshkian | 0% |
| Saeed Jalili | 0% |
| Hassan Rouhani | 0% |
| Mahmoud Ahmadinejad | 0% |
| Mohammad Khatami | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
| Mohammad Pakpour | 0% |
| Ali Larijani | 0% |
| Abbas Araghchi | 0% |
| Ahmad Vahidi | 0% |
| Mohsen Araki | 0% |
| Nasir Hosseini | 0% |
| Ahmad Hosseini Khorasani | 0% |
| Ali Asghar Hejazi | 0% |
| o | 0% |
| p | 0% |
| q | 0% |
| r | 0% |
| s | 0% |
| t | 0% |
| u | 0% |
| v | 0% |
| w | 0% |
| x | 0% |
| y | 0% |
| z | 0% |
| aa | 0% |
| ab | 0% |
| ac | 0% |
| ad | 0% |
| ae | 0% |
| af | 0% |
| ag | 0% |
| ah | 0% |
| ai | 0% |
| aj | 0% |
| ak | 0% |
| al | 0% |
| am | 0% |
| an | 0% |
| ao | 0% |
| ap | 0% |
| aq | 0% |
| ar | 0% |
| as | 0% |
| at | 0% |
| au | 0% |
| av | 0% |
| aw | 0% |
| ax | 0% |
| ay | 0% |
| az | 0% |
| ba | 0% |
| bb | 0% |
| bc | 0% |
| bd | 0% |
| be | 0% |
| bf | 0% |
| bg | 0% |
| bh | 0% |
| bi | 0% |
| bj | 0% |
| bk | 0% |
| bl | 0% |
| bm | 0% |
| bn | 0% |
| bo | 0% |
| bp | 0% |
| bq | 0% |
| br | 0% |
| bs | 0% |
| bt | 0% |
| bu | 0% |
| bv | 0% |
| bw | 0% |
| bx | 0% |
| by | 0% |
| bz | 0% |
| ca | 0% |
| cb | 0% |
| cc | 0% |
| cd | 0% |
| ce | 0% |
| cf | 0% |
| cg | 0% |
| ch | 0% |
| ci | 0% |
| cj | 0% |
| ck | 0% |
| cl | 0% |
| cm | 0% |
| cn | 0% |
| co | 0% |
| cp | 0% |
| cq | 0% |
| cr | 0% |
| cs | 0% |
| ct | 0% |
| cu | 0% |
| cv | 0% |
| cw | 0% |
| cx | 0% |
| cy | 0% |
| cz | 0% |
Market context
Iran’s leadership question is being shaped by the post-Khamenei succession and by whether real authority stays with the clerical office or shifts further towards the security apparatus. Reuters reported in late April that the Guards had seized wartime power and that Mojtaba Khamenei’s role had become more about endorsing decisions than issuing them, which is why the market still treats the identity of the de facto ruler as contestable rather than purely formal.[2] Even though the current crowd price implies only a 3% chance on the non-front-running outcome, that low number sits against a backdrop in which institutional continuity has so far mattered more than public symbolism.[14]
The main historical frame is that Iranian transitions often look orderly on paper but are decided by factional control in practice. CFR’s work on leadership transition stresses that the supreme leader’s authority is embedded in a wider network of clerical, military and institutional power, while Rasanah argues that no successor is likely to command Khamenei’s old level of personal dominance.[4][3] Reuters also noted after Khamenei’s death that no clear decision-maker remained and that the regime’s survival logic would keep the IRGC central, which supports reading this market through regime durability rather than a simple succession announcement.[1][5]
For traders, the catalyst to watch is whether the current hierarchy hardens around a single name or whether poll movements, elite statements and any new assembly or security decisions show power migrating away from the formal supreme-leader line. Reuters’ March and April coverage is the key news lens here: one report said intelligence saw no imminent state collapse, while later reporting described Guards commanders dictating strategy, so any fresh declaration from the Assembly of Experts, IRGC-linked figures, or senior clerical offices would matter more than international recognition.[14][2] That makes the market most sensitive to concrete control signals over the armed forces, broadcasting, and national decision-making, not just to who is publicly announced.
Methodology
This page tracks Iran leader end of 2026? across four political prediction venues. Live odds come from the Polymarket order book (the deepest political prediction-market book). Kalshi is the CFTC-regulated US alternative, Betfair the established UK sports-exchange with politics markets, Manifold the open play-money variant. For users geo-blocked from Polymarket directly, brokers like Election Predictions UK provide a 0%-fee route into the same order book.
Resolution & payout
Political markets typically settle on official candidate or agency confirmation. Polymarket uses UMA Optimistic Oracle: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window opens, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD via CFTC clearinghouse, with clearly defined resolution sources (e.g. AP race calls for elections). Betfair settles after the official outcome is registered with the league or agency. Manifold is play-money.
FAQ
- How accurate are political prediction markets?
- Historically more accurate than polls. Polymarket's Brier score on US 2024 elections was ~0.11 — better than 538 (~0.14) and every mainstream poll. Markets aggregate information with real skin in the game.
- What resolution source is used for elections?
- Polymarket defines the source per contract — usually Associated Press (AP Race Call), Reuters or the official electoral commission. The source is stated in contract details before the market opens.
- Which platform has the deepest political liquidity?
- Polymarket — by far. US 2024 presidential volume was ~$3.5B vs Kalshi (~$200M) and Betfair (~$120M). Where Polymarket is geo-blocked, brokers like Election Predictions UK route into the same order book at 0% fees.
- How fast do political markets react to news?
- High-liquidity markets move within seconds to minutes. A Trump tweet on the economy can shift the "Trump 2024" market 2-5 points before mainstream media has written anything.
- Which political events have the biggest volume?
- US Presidential election, party nominations (DNC/RNC), Senate majorities, individual state outcomes (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin), and major European elections. Peak markets reach $50-500M per event.
Trade Iran leader end of 2026? on Election Predictions UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →